‘Kans op hartaanval rokers sterk overdreven’

In een vandaag uitgegeven verklaring stelt een nieuwe tabaksonderneming dat het risico dat rokers lopen op een hartaanval sterk wordt overdreven. Volgens het bedrijf is het eigenlijke risico erg klein, gelijk aan dat van een niet-roker die gedurende 30 minuten lage niveaus van omgevingsrook inademt.

“A smoker who smokes two and a half packs per day for 45 years is at no more risk of a fatal heart attack than someone who never lit up a cigarette in their life but waited for 30 minutes to pick up take-out Chinese food in a restaurant that allows smoking. In fact, their risk of a fatal myocardial infarction is exactly the same.”

Anti-rokers zijn razend!

In response to Global Tobacco’s statement, anti-smoking groups were outraged. They called the claim completely fallacious and challenged Global Tobacco to provide documentation for its claim. One anti-smoking organization threatened to file a lawsuit charging Global Tobacco with consumer fraud for making such an obvious and blatantly fraudulent health claim.

According to a spokesperson for the upstart anti-smoking group Citizens for Truth: “This claim by Global Tobacco is simply an attempt to undermine years of public education about the dangers of smoking. Anyone with common sense knows that someone who has smoked for 40 years cannot possibly have the same risk of a fatal heart attack as someone who walks into a mildly smoky Chinese restaurant for 30 minutes. If Global Tobacco does not retract this statement, we are prepared to file a lawsuit tomorrow charging the company with making a fraudulent health claim under state consumer protection law.”

When pressed for documentation of its claim, Global Tobacco defended itself by stating that it was simply taking the claim from material put out by an anti-smoking organization, which stated that: “Even for people without such respiratory conditions, breathing drifting tobacco smoke for even brief periods can be deadly. For example, the Centers for Disease Control [CDC] has warned that breathing drifting tobacco smoke for as little as 30 minutes (less than the time one might be exposed outdoors on a beach, sitting on a park bench, listening to a concert in a park, etc.) can raise a nonsmoker’?s risk of suffering a fatal heart attack to that of a smoker.”

Global Tobacco pointed out that in its opinion, it was actually being conservative, since the anti-smoking organization’s claim related to drifting tobacco smoke such as sitting on a park bench, while its claim related to much higher exposure – waiting for an order of Moo Goo Gai Pan and Kung Bo Chicken in a mildly smoky restaurant. “We’re not talking merely about drifting tobacco smoke; we’re talking about a bona fide moderate exposure, with continuous moderate levels of smoke, not just drifting, but being immersed in the plume for 30 minutes.”

Global Tobacco added that its health claim was further justified, because a published study had concluded that the effects of smoking on endothelial function in smokers were about equal to the effects among nonsmokers after 30 minutes of exposure to secondhand smoke. “The evidence clearly demonstrated that endothelial dysfunction among heavy smokers is no worse than among nonsmokers who are exposed transiently to secondhand smoke. And besides,” added the Global Tobacco spokesperson, “there were two newspaper articles that said this.”

Citizens for Truth countered by pointing out that the study cited by Global Tobacco only measured endothelial dysfunction in coronary arteries, not fatal heart attack risk: “Endothelial dysfunction is simply a measure of the very early stages of atherosclerosis. You’re not going to tell us that you can go from clean coronary arteries to occluded coronary arteries in 30 minutes in a nonsmoker, when even in heavy smokers, it takes many years to develop coronary stenosis. If what Global Tobacco is saying were true, we would be seeing fatal heart attacks among lots of 18 year-olds. After all, they have smoked for a whole lot more than 30 minutes if they started at age 16.”

A prominent cardiologist supported the Citizens for Truth position: “Atherosclerosis is a gradual process. It doesn’t happen in 30 minutes.”

A Citizens for Truth press release called it “particularly despicable” that Global Tobacco would undermine public health education efforts about the serious cardiovascular health effects of smoking: “This is the 21st century. We thought that tobacco company deception about the health effects of smoking was a thing of the past. But Global Tobacco’s health claim completely undermines more than 40 years of public health efforts to ensure that the public understands the serious heart attack risk associated with smoking. To suggest that this risk is no more than being exposed to 30 minutes of secondhand smoke — it’s hard to believe that could happen in 2006.”

Citizens for Truth said it is considering filing a post-trial amicus brief in the Department of Justice tobacco lawsuit, since this recent action by Global Tobacco “substantially strengthens the government’s contention that RICO violations are continuing, not just a thing of the past.”

Nevertheless, Global Tobacco did not seem overly concerned: “We’re not worried. If this goes to court, we feel quite confident that any reasonable judge will agree that we are merely repeating the message sent by an anti-smoking organization, which, by definition, must be true. And even if it’s not, why should we be held to a different standard than anyone else? Shouldn’t there be a level playing field for scientific accuracy?”

De tabaksfabrikant heeft in dit geval met geen woord gelogen. Nog sterker: ze herhalen alleen maar uitspraken van de anti-rokenbeweging!

Het zou zomaar kunnen!
Zie ook

Geef een reactie

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *

Download poster


  • "Es ist schwieriger, eine vorgefaßte Meinung zu zertrümmern als ein Atom."
    (Het is moeilijker een vooroordeel aan flarden te schieten dan een atoom.)
    Albert Einstein

  • "Als je alles zou laten dat slecht is voor je gezondheid, dan ging je kapot"
    Anonieme arts

  • "The effects of other people smoking in my presence is so small it doesn't worry me."
    Sir Richard Doll, 2001

  • "Een leugen wordt de waarheid als hij maar vaak genoeg wordt herhaald"
    Joseph Goebbels, Minister van Propaganda, Nazi Duitsland

  • "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
    Mahatma Gandhi

  • "There''s no such thing as perfect air. If there was, God wouldn''t have put bristles in our noses"
    Coun. Bill Clement

  • "Better a smoking freedom than a non-smoking tyranny"
    Antonio Martino, Italiaanse Minister van Defensie

  • "If smoking cigars is not permitted in heaven, I won't go."
    Mark Twain

  • I've alllllllways said that asking smokers "do you want to quit?" and reporting the results of that question, as is, is horribly misleading. It's a TWO part question. After asking if one wants to quit it must be followed up with "Why?" Ask why and the majority of the answers will be "because I'm supposed to" (victims of guilt and propaganda), not "because I want to."
    Audrey Silk, NYCCLASH