Big Pharma en de medische wetenschap

In een boeiend verhaal in de Easy Diagnosis Second Opinions Newsletter wordt kort beschreven hoe farmaceutische bedrijven invloed uitoefenen op de publicaties in medische tijdschriften en hoe negen van de tien schrijvers en ‘peer reviewers’ in die bladen banden hebben met diezelfde farmaceuten.

The science fiction writer, Neal Stephenson, author of Snow Crash (1992), the three part trilogy The Baroque Cycle, and other philosophical-historical novels, offers an intriguing name to current medical economics. He describes how the political system has always been subject to “power disorders,” sudden deviations or disequilibria in which “certain groups or persons suddenly concentrate a lot of power and abuse it.” Does this phenomenon describe what is happening to medicine today? Or is it perhaps only one of many pathologies afflicting our present system of health care?

Dr. Paul Rosch, President of The American Institute of Stress, discusses Big Pharma in his outstanding publication, Health and
. He documents multiple examples of “misleading drug
promotion, overpricing, and the corruption of the medical and Governmental
establishment by the pharmaceutical industry in a pattern of widespread abuse.”
Dr. Rosch also reports that a year ago 94% of the more than 5,000 scientists at
NIH were engaged in lucrative conflict of interest activities, and that top
officials had received over $2.5 million in fees and stock options from drug
companies over the past decade. In 2002, the pharmaceutical industry spent $91.4
million on federal lobbying activities, and at least another $50 million was
spent to “influence Congress and others through advertising, direct mail,
telemarketing, and grants. Drug companies had 675 registered lobbyists and 26 of
these were former members of Congress.” This, according to other articles quoted
by CNN and appearing in The New York Times, The New Yorker, Time, The Nation,
and other publications, is only the tip of the iceberg.

Big Pharma and the Ties That Bind: The Politics of Drug

Geef een reactie

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *

Download poster


  • "Es ist schwieriger, eine vorgefaßte Meinung zu zertrümmern als ein Atom."
    (Het is moeilijker een vooroordeel aan flarden te schieten dan een atoom.)
    Albert Einstein

  • "Als je alles zou laten dat slecht is voor je gezondheid, dan ging je kapot"
    Anonieme arts

  • "The effects of other people smoking in my presence is so small it doesn't worry me."
    Sir Richard Doll, 2001

  • "Een leugen wordt de waarheid als hij maar vaak genoeg wordt herhaald"
    Joseph Goebbels, Minister van Propaganda, Nazi Duitsland

  • "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
    Mahatma Gandhi

  • "There''s no such thing as perfect air. If there was, God wouldn''t have put bristles in our noses"
    Coun. Bill Clement

  • "Better a smoking freedom than a non-smoking tyranny"
    Antonio Martino, Italiaanse Minister van Defensie

  • "If smoking cigars is not permitted in heaven, I won't go."
    Mark Twain

  • I've alllllllways said that asking smokers "do you want to quit?" and reporting the results of that question, as is, is horribly misleading. It's a TWO part question. After asking if one wants to quit it must be followed up with "Why?" Ask why and the majority of the answers will be "because I'm supposed to" (victims of guilt and propaganda), not "because I want to."
    Audrey Silk, NYCCLASH