Intolerantie en arrogantie

Dat zijn de kwalificaties die Elizabeth Whelan, directeur van de American Council on Science and Health, meegeeft aan de moderne anti-rokenbeweging. In een artikel op de site van de organisatie beticht ze de anti-rokers van bedrog, manipulatie en regelrechte leugens, met name als het over meeroken gaat.


Hiermee stapt ze in het voetspoor van Michael Siegel, de dissidente anti-rokenwetenschapper aan de Universiteit van Boston. Ook Whelan concludeert, net als Siegel, dat de anti-rokenbeweging door deze groteske overdrijving, haar eigen graf aan het graven is.


“…. anti-smokers are becoming increasingly unscientific, arrogant, absolutist, and intolerant of dissenting views”


Sure, exposure to cigarette smoke has all types of negative acute effects, including increased risk of earaches, inner ear infections, asthma, upper respiratory ailments, and more.  No argument about that.  And it smells nasty, makes your clothes and hair stink, and can ruin a perfectly nice dinner (ACSH did a report in 1999 on the limited but real effects of secondhand smoke).


But anti-smokers can’t let it rest at that. They claim that even transient exposure to secondhand smoke causes everything from breast cancer to heart disease.


A few egregious examples: a leading tobacco researcher made the improbable claim that the smoking ban in Helena, Montana resulted in a 40% decline in heart attack admissions in a six-month period after the ban.  “We used to think that heart disease came after years of exposure” said Dr. Richard Sargent, an anti-smoking Montana physician, who then went on to argue that even short-term exposure to exhaled smoke can damage the heart: “if you go into a restaurant for a sandwich, if you go into a bar for a beer, and you get exposed to a heavy amount of secondhand smoke, you’re just as at risk for a heart attack as a smoker.”


Sargent, vice chairman of the Montana Tobacco Advisory Board, noted that secondhand smoke has “an acute, rapid effect on the heart…[T]hirty minutes of exposure doubles your risk for the next forty-eight hours.”


Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights makes similar claims: “even a half hour of secondhand smoke exposure causes heart damage similar to that of habitual smokers.  Nonsmokers’ heart arteries showed a reduced ability to dilate, diminishing the ability of the heart to get life-giving blood.”


Give me a break.


While being exposed to cigarette smoke for hours a day for many years certainly could have negative effects, it is unacceptable to use such exaggerated claims to justify a ban on smoking.


The Intolerance and Arrogance of the Modern-Day Anti-Smoking Movement

Geef een antwoord

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd.

Download poster

Citaten

  • "Es ist schwieriger, eine vorgefaßte Meinung zu zertrümmern als ein Atom."
    (Het is moeilijker een vooroordeel aan flarden te schieten dan een atoom.)
    Albert Einstein

  • "Als je alles zou laten dat slecht is voor je gezondheid, dan ging je kapot"
    Anonieme arts

  • "The effects of other people smoking in my presence is so small it doesn't worry me."
    Sir Richard Doll, 2001

  • "Een leugen wordt de waarheid als hij maar vaak genoeg wordt herhaald"
    Joseph Goebbels, Minister van Propaganda, Nazi Duitsland


  • "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
    Mahatma Gandhi

  • "There''s no such thing as perfect air. If there was, God wouldn''t have put bristles in our noses"
    Coun. Bill Clement

  • "Better a smoking freedom than a non-smoking tyranny"
    Antonio Martino, Italiaanse Minister van Defensie

  • "If smoking cigars is not permitted in heaven, I won't go."
    Mark Twain

  • I've alllllllways said that asking smokers "do you want to quit?" and reporting the results of that question, as is, is horribly misleading. It's a TWO part question. After asking if one wants to quit it must be followed up with "Why?" Ask why and the majority of the answers will be "because I'm supposed to" (victims of guilt and propaganda), not "because I want to."
    Audrey Silk, NYCCLASH