FDA gaat tabak niet controleren

Een voorstel om tabaksproducten onder controle te brengen van de Food and Drug Administration is gisteren in het Amerikaanse congres gesneuveld. FDA controle over tabak zou het product gelijk gesteld hebben met soft drugs of medicijnen en de overheidscontrole op de productie en handel onder strenge regels hebben geplaatst.

Dat is een grote tegenvaller voor de anti-tabakslobby maar ook voor Philip Morris dat zich, vreemd genoeg, altijd hiervoor uitgesproken heeft. Welke geheime agenda achter deze opstelling van Philip Morris huist is niet officieel bekend.

In a major setback for public health groups, congressional tax negotiators on Tuesday blocked a plan to allow the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco, but a $10 billion package for tobacco farmers was set to be approved.

Senators supported inclusion of the FDA measure in a massive corporate tax bill but House Republicans blocked them.

Negotiators were not able to wrap up work on Tuesday and some anti-tobacco lawmakers said they would attempt to strike or modify tobacco provisions again on Wednesday. But statements by several negotiators suggested the odds were against them.

The tobacco industry has been divided on FDA legislation, with Altria Group Inc. (MO.N: Quote, Profile, Research) , the parent company of Marlboro-maker Philip Morris, supporting it and other key tobacco companies including Reynolds American Inc.’s (RAI.N: Quote, Profile, Research) R.J. Reynolds Tobacco unit opposing it.

The House-Senate compromise package must still be approved by the full House and Senate and a few anti-smoking senators have vowed to try to stop the tax bill in the Senate unless it has the FDA language in it.

If the bill “contains a tobacco buyout for farmers but does not include the FDA provisions, it will seriously jeopardize passage,” Massachusetts Democrat Sen. Edward Kennedy said. “We cannot in good conscience allow the federal agency most responsible for protecting the public health to remain powerless to deal with the enormous health risks of cigarettes.”

Analyse en commentaar

Geef een reactie

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *

Download poster


  • "Es ist schwieriger, eine vorgefaßte Meinung zu zertrümmern als ein Atom."
    (Het is moeilijker een vooroordeel aan flarden te schieten dan een atoom.)
    Albert Einstein

  • "Als je alles zou laten dat slecht is voor je gezondheid, dan ging je kapot"
    Anonieme arts

  • "The effects of other people smoking in my presence is so small it doesn't worry me."
    Sir Richard Doll, 2001

  • "Een leugen wordt de waarheid als hij maar vaak genoeg wordt herhaald"
    Joseph Goebbels, Minister van Propaganda, Nazi Duitsland

  • "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
    Mahatma Gandhi

  • "There''s no such thing as perfect air. If there was, God wouldn''t have put bristles in our noses"
    Coun. Bill Clement

  • "Better a smoking freedom than a non-smoking tyranny"
    Antonio Martino, Italiaanse Minister van Defensie

  • "If smoking cigars is not permitted in heaven, I won't go."
    Mark Twain

  • I've alllllllways said that asking smokers "do you want to quit?" and reporting the results of that question, as is, is horribly misleading. It's a TWO part question. After asking if one wants to quit it must be followed up with "Why?" Ask why and the majority of the answers will be "because I'm supposed to" (victims of guilt and propaganda), not "because I want to."
    Audrey Silk, NYCCLASH